When you write XML code, you need to follow the rules.This means root elements, nesting and a declaration statement.I know parsing check file structure (grammar), so may be checked as OK in parsing function, but may be WRONG in validation process because there is no attr value like "pink"? Parsing checks that the input conforms to the rules in the XML specification, for example that every start tag has a matching end tag.
This month, however, we tackle just one, the question of questions -- the question that nearly everyone asks at some point: Which XML parser should I use?
With such an avalanche of queries, you'd think our priority would be to answer as many as possible.
Programmers that design software look for standalone parsers to view their code.
Beyond that, they serve little purpose because most editing software will have a parser built-in that you will use during the course of your work.
That parser provides vital information to the program on how to read the file. They can be free-standing software, libraries, modules and classes. This is true for development platforms as well, such as Java or Delphi. Software is smart, but computers by themselves are ignorant.
Unless you are building your own software, there is no need to worry about finding an XML parser. When presented with a bunch of XML code, computer hardware has no clue what it means or what to do with it.If external document type definitions (DTDs) or schemas are required for validation, the Xml Resolver property is used.The following tables outline the values for the Validation Type property.This is a parser that works outside of any other program.Standalone parsers are exactly what they sound like; separate packages that only parse XML.The Validation Type property determines the type of validation performed by the Xml Validating Reader.